LIV Golf star Phil Mickelson publicly criticized San Francisco's leadership on social media after a WalletHub report ranked the city as the worst-run in the U.S. (148 out of 148 cities). The report highlighted poor financial stability and high budget per capita. San Francisco has also faced ongoing ridicule for its rising homeless population and open-air drug use, issues that prompted recent voter changes in city leadership.
LIV Golf star Phil Mickelson takes swipe at San Francisco's leadership after critical report
Liv-golfGolfSports
AI Summary
TL;DR: Key points with love ❤️LIV Golf star Phil Mickelson publicly criticized San Francisco's leadership on social media after a WalletHub report ranked the city as the worst-run in the U.S. (148 out of 148 cities). The report highlighted poor financial stability and high budget per capita. San Francisco has also faced ongoing ridicule for its rising homeless population and open-air drug use, issues that prompted recent voter changes in city leadership.
Trending- 1 Months ago: Daniel Lurie was elected, beating incumbent Democrat London Breed.
- 2 February (past): Basketball legend Charles Barkley criticized San Francisco.
- 3 Tuesday (recent): Phil Mickelson posted his criticism on X.
- Increased public scrutiny and criticism of San Francisco's city leadership
- Reinforcement of negative perceptions regarding the city's management and social issues
What: LIV Golf star Phil Mickelson criticized the city of San Francisco's leadership.
When: Mickelson posted his criticism on X on 'Tuesday'. The ranking came 'months after' the election of Daniel Lurie.
Where: San Francisco, California, United States.
Why: Mickelson reacted to a WalletHub report that ranked San Francisco as the worst-run city in the U.S., citing poor leadership, financial instability, and high budget per capita. The city has also been widely criticized for its homelessness and open-air drug use issues.
How: Mickelson expressed his criticism in a post on X (formerly Twitter). The WalletHub study measured 'effectiveness of local leadership' based on six metrics: financial stability, education, health, safety, economy, and infrastructure/pollution.