Karen Read's defense attorneys, David Yannetti and Robert Alessi, discussed the turning point in her murder trial where they believe the prosecution lost credibility: a misstep by special prosecutor Hank Brennan regarding holes in the victim's sweatshirt. Read was found not guilty of murder, manslaughter, and fleeing a deadly crash, but guilty of drunken driving.
Karen Read's lawyers identify exact moment prosecution 'lost the case' in murder trial
Karen-readTrue-crimeBostonTrialsUnited StatesHomicideMassachusetts
AI Summary
TL;DR: Key points with love ❤️Karen Read's defense attorneys, David Yannetti and Robert Alessi, discussed the turning point in her murder trial where they believe the prosecution lost credibility: a misstep by special prosecutor Hank Brennan regarding holes in the victim's sweatshirt. Read was found not guilty of murder, manslaughter, and fleeing a deadly crash, but guilty of drunken driving.
Trending- 1 Trial occurred
- 2 Misstep by Hank Brennan occurred during trial
- 3 Jurors found Read not guilty of murder, manslaughter, fleeing scene
- 4 Jurors found Read guilty of drunken driving
- 5 Over the weekend: Defense attorneys discussed the trial
- Karen Read found not guilty of murder, manslaughter, and fleeing a deadly crash
- Found guilty of drunken driving (one year probation)
- Calls for legal reforms
- Prosecution's credibility undermined
What: Karen Read's defense attorneys analyzing the turning point in her murder trial that led to her acquittal on major charges.
When: Over the weekend (discussion); trial concluded recently.
Where: Massachusetts (trial location), Boston (victim's police force).
Why: To explain why the defense believes the prosecution lost the case and to advocate for legal reforms.
How: A misstep by special prosecutor Hank Brennan during questioning about holes in the victim's sweatshirt, which were made by a state police technician, undermined the prosecution's credibility.