The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear *Little vs. Hecox*, a case originating from Idaho's 2020 law banning trans athletes in women's and girls' sports. Idaho Attorney General Raul Labrador, leading the defense, hopes for a national precedent ruling on whether men can participate in women's sports and how federal laws protect transgender individuals. The case began when trans athlete Lindsay Hecox sued Idaho, and two former Idaho State University athletes, Madison Kenyon and Mary Kate Marshall, joined the defense after competing against a male athlete.
Attorney general leading the Supreme Court trans athlete case defense speaks out
CourtIdahoSports
AI Summary
TL;DR: Key points with love ❤️The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear *Little vs. Hecox*, a case originating from Idaho's 2020 law banning trans athletes in women's and girls' sports. Idaho Attorney General Raul Labrador, leading the defense, hopes for a national precedent ruling on whether men can participate in women's sports and how federal laws protect transgender individuals. The case began when trans athlete Lindsay Hecox sued Idaho, and two former Idaho State University athletes, Madison Kenyon and Mary Kate Marshall, joined the defense after competing against a male athlete.
Trending- 1 2020: Idaho becomes a forerunner for states with laws banning trans athletes in women's and girls' sports.
- 2 2020: Trans athlete Lindsay Hecox sues the state of Idaho.
- 3 U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho grants a preliminary injunction, blocking the law.
- 4 2021: Former Idaho State University women's athletes Madison Kenyon and Mary Kate Marshall join the lawsuit as willing defendants.
- 5 The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals upholds the injunction.
- 6 Last week: The Supreme Court agrees to hear the case *Little vs. Hecox*.
- 7 Wednesday (implied): Attorney General Raul Labrador speaks to Fox News Digital about the case.
- Potential national precedent on trans athletes in women's sports
- Significant impact on state and federal laws regarding transgender individuals' rights and participation in sports
- Continued legal and societal debate on gender identity in sports.
What: The U.S. Supreme Court will hear the case *Little vs. Hecox*, which challenges Idaho's law banning trans athletes in women's and girls' sports, with Idaho Attorney General Raul Labrador aiming for a national precedent.
When: Last week (Supreme Court agreed to hear); case began in 2020 (Idaho law passed); 2021 (college students joined lawsuit); article published July 9, 2025.
Where: Idaho, United States; U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho; 9th Circuit Court of Appeals; Supreme Court.
Why: To determine the constitutionality of state laws banning trans athletes from women's sports and to establish a national precedent on the issue of transgender individuals' participation in sports under federal law.
How: Through a legal challenge initiated by a trans athlete against Idaho's law, which has progressed through lower courts and now reached the Supreme Court for a final ruling.