Closing arguments concluded in Sean 'Diddy' Combs' sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy trial in New York. Prosecutors argued he coerced and forced ex-girlfriends into sex with male sex workers, citing violence and other alleged crimes like kidnapping and arson. The defense lawyer, Marc Agnifilo, countered that prosecutors were overreaching and misinterpreting a consensual 'swinger lifestyle,' mocking their evidence. Jurors will begin deliberations on Monday.
Key moments from the closing arguments at Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs’ sex trafficking trial
CultureWorld
AI Summary
TL;DR: Key points with love ❤️Closing arguments concluded in Sean 'Diddy' Combs' sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy trial in New York. Prosecutors argued he coerced and forced ex-girlfriends into sex with male sex workers, citing violence and other alleged crimes like kidnapping and arson. The defense lawyer, Marc Agnifilo, countered that prosecutors were overreaching and misinterpreting a consensual 'swinger lifestyle,' mocking their evidence. Jurors will begin deliberations on Monday.
Trending- 1 November 2023: Casandra 'Cassie' Ventura sued Sean Combs, settling the next day, but triggering a criminal probe.
- 2 Trial first week: Cassie Ventura testified for four days.
- 3 Last week (prior to June 29): Prosecutors triggered headlines by removing instructions on arson and kidnapping claims.
- 4 Thursday/Friday (prior to June 29): Closing arguments presented by prosecutors and defense.
- 5 Monday (following June 29): Judge to read instructions to jurors, deliberations to begin.
- Jury deliberations to begin
- Potential conviction for sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy
- Potential impact on 'swinger lifestyle' interpretation in law (defense argument)
What: Closing arguments were presented in the sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy trial of Sean 'Diddy' Combs.
When: Thursday and Friday (prior to June 29, 2025); jury deliberations begin Monday.
Where: New York, United States (courtroom).
Why: Sean 'Diddy' Combs is accused of sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy, coercing ex-girlfriends into sexual acts and committing other crimes like kidnapping and arson.
How: Prosecutors presented their case, citing alleged acts of violence and other crimes. The defense argued the prosecution was overreaching and misinterpreting consensual activities.