An opinion piece from Fox News criticizes broadcast TV networks for their allegedly biased coverage of recent Los Angeles riots, which erupted after immigration raids. The article claims networks downplayed violence, excused protesters, and avoided party labels for Democrats opposing Trump's actions, while condemning Trump's use of the National Guard as a provocation.
BROADCAST BIAS: Media's LA riot coverage relies on a sneaky trick to look less one-sided
OpinionUs-protestsIllegalLosangeles
AI Summary
TL;DR: Key points with love ❤️An opinion piece from Fox News criticizes broadcast TV networks for their allegedly biased coverage of recent Los Angeles riots, which erupted after immigration raids. The article claims networks downplayed violence, excused protesters, and avoided party labels for Democrats opposing Trump's actions, while condemning Trump's use of the National Guard as a provocation.
Trending- 1 June 6, 2025: Riots broke out in the Los Angeles area after several immigration raids by U.S. Immigrations and Custom Enforcement.
- 2 Monday morning, June 9, 2025: Network morning shows began anti-Trump coverage.
- 3 Wednesday night, June 11, 2025: ABC's 'World News Tonight' reported on 37 mayors opposing Trump.
- 4 Thursday night, June 12, 2025: ABC evening anchor David Muir reported on Senator Alex Padilla's incident at a press conference.
- Erosion of trust in mainstream media among Republicans and independent voters.
- Increased political polarization and partisan division.
- Ongoing debate about media ethics and objectivity in political reporting.
What: Criticism of broadcast television networks for perceived biased coverage of recent riots in Los Angeles and anti-Trump protests.
When: Riots broke out on June 6 (2025); network morning shows began anti-Trump coverage by Monday morning (June 9, 2025); 'World News Tonight' on Wednesday night, June 11 (2025); ABC evening anchor on Thursday night (June 12, 2025).
Where: Los Angeles, U.S.; Edward R. Roybal Federal Building (downtown Los Angeles), U.S.; Washington, D.C., U.S. (implied for Trump's parade).
Why: The author argues that networks act as 'publicity partners' for Democrats, aligning against Trump's immigration policies and his use of the National Guard, while excusing violent protest actions and promoting a one-sided narrative.
How: Networks allegedly used phrases like 'mostly peaceful' to describe violent protests, treated Trump's National Guard deployment as a provocation, avoided putting party labels on Democrat opponents of Trump, and focused on Democratic narratives without fact-checking them.