iAsk.ca

Labour using Brexit to weaken nature laws, MPs say

(1 week ago)
Helena Horton
Green politicsPlanning policyLabourBrexitEnvironmentPoliticsUK

AI Summary

TL;DR: Key points with love ❤️

Labour MPs and other parties accuse the Labour government of using post-Brexit freedoms to weaken EU-derived nature laws through a new planning and infrastructure bill. Critics argue the bill allows developers to build over protected habitats by paying into a fund, threatening 'jewels in the crown' for nature and risking a 'regression' in environmental protection.

Trending
  1. 1 Over the last eight years: Water and pesticide standards have been weakened.
  2. 2 Current: Planning and infrastructure bill going through parliament.
  3. 3 This week: The Guardian revealed the bill poses a threat to 5,251 areas.
  • Weakening of environmental protections in the UK.
  • Potential destruction of precious natural habitats and species.
  • Public confusion and outrage among environmentally-minded voters.
  • Political backlash and opposition from other parties and environmental groups.
What: Labour is accused by MPs and environmental groups of using post-Brexit freedoms to weaken nature laws through a new planning and infrastructure bill.
When: Current (bill going through parliament), over the last eight years (water and pesticide standards).
Where: UK Parliament, various natural landscapes in the UK (New Forest, Surrey Heaths, Peak District Moors, Forest of Bowland, Itchen river, Wensum river).
Why: The planning bill allows developers to circumvent EU-derived environmental protections by paying into a nature restoration fund, which critics argue will lead to the destruction of precious habitats.
How: The Labour government is pushing a planning and infrastructure bill through parliament. Opposition MPs and environmental groups are raising concerns and planning to vote against or amend the bill.

Labour MPs and other parties accuse the Labour government of using post-Brexit freedoms to weaken EU-derived nature laws through a new planning and infrastructure bill. Critics argue the bill allows developers to build over protected habitats by paying into a fund, threatening 'jewels in the crown' for nature and risking a 'regression' in environmental protection.