Kelowna City Council has decided to put on hold a proposal for a curbside food waste collection program for single-family homes. Concerns included unclear costs, potential odour issues from a new transfer station, and the program's limited scope, as it excluded multi-family residences. The Regional District of Central Okanagan (RDCO), which spearheaded the initiative, will now seek feedback from other local governments, expecting costs to rise significantly without Kelowna's participation.
Kelowna city council turns down curbside food waste pickup program
KelownaFood wasteFood Waste
AI Summary
TL;DR: Key points with love ❤️
Kelowna City Council has decided to put on hold a proposal for a curbside food waste collection program for single-family homes. Concerns included unclear costs, potential odour issues from a new transfer station, and the program's limited scope, as it excluded multi-family residences. The Regional District of Central Okanagan (RDCO), which spearheaded the initiative, will now seek feedback from other local governments, expecting costs to rise significantly without Kelowna's participation.
- 1 Recently: Kelowna City Council decided not to move forward with the curbside food waste pickup program proposal.
- 2 The Regional District of Central Okanagan (RDCO) will now seek feedback from other local governments.
- 3 2030: Kelowna's mayor and council plan to revisit the food waste program.
- Plans for curbside food waste collection in Kelowna are put on hold.
- The cost per household for the program is expected to climb significantly for other participating municipalities without Kelowna's involvement.
- The landfill's life will be extended by fewer years than initially hoped.
- The RDCO will now seek feedback from other local governments.
What: Kelowna City Council has rejected a proposal for a curbside food waste pickup program for single-family homes.
When: The decision was made recently.
Where: Kelowna, British Columbia.
Why: Council members raised concerns about unclear costs, potential odour issues from the proposed new transfer facility, and the program's limited scope, which excluded multi-family residences.
How: The city council voted not to move forward with the proposal.