iAsk.ca

Opinion: Immigration bans worsen the problem they’re meant to solve

Doug Saunders
Opinion

AI Summary

TL;DR: Key points with love ❤️

An opinion piece argues that immigration bans, such as Donald Trump's recent order banning entry from 12 countries, often worsen the problem they intend to solve by incentivizing illegal migration. The author contends that such bans do not target major sources of irregular immigration or violent extremism, and that robust screening processes in regular immigration systems are more effective.

Trending
  1. 1 Trump's first term: Walling-off of southern border and closure of legal entry forms.
  2. 2 Previous week (approx. May 29, 2025): Horrific hate crime committed against American Jews in Boulder, allegedly by an Egyptian man.
  3. 3 This week (approx. June 2-6, 2025): Donald Trump issued order to ban entry to US by citizens of 12 countries.
  4. 4 2024: Irregular entries reduced to negligible levels through judicious use of limited legal pathways.
  • Increased illegal migration
  • Damaged relations with African countries (as warned by leaders)
  • Failure to address violent extremism effectively
  • Potential for domestic radicalization
What: Opinion piece discussing the counterproductive effects of immigration bans.
When: 'This week' (Trump's order); 'previous week' (hate crime in Boulder); 'first term' (Trump's presidency); 2024 (irregular entries reduced).
Where: United States, Boulder (Colorado), Canada, Africa, Egypt, Kuwait.
Why: To argue that immigration bans are ineffective and counterproductive, based on historical evidence and policy analysis.
How: Analysis of Trump's recent ban, comparison to previous policies, discussion of screening processes, and the incentive structure created by bans.

An opinion piece argues that immigration bans, such as Donald Trump's recent order banning entry from 12 countries, often worsen the problem they intend to solve by incentivizing illegal migration. The author contends that such bans do not target major sources of irregular immigration or violent extremism, and that robust screening processes in regular immigration systems are more effective.