The author critiques the recent surge in pronatalist discourse and policies from right-wing politicians, tech billionaires, and commentators (e.g., JD Vance, Elon Musk, Nigel Farage), who advocate for increased birth rates. The author argues that these proponents fail to acknowledge the immense practical challenges and lack of support faced by parents, particularly those without extensive staff or resources, and proposes a 'parenting entrance test' for them.
You say we need more babies, rightwingers? Come back to me after you’ve fought in the trenches of soft play
Parents and parentingSocietyLife and styleJD VanceWomenElon MuskNigel Farage
AI Summary
TL;DR: Key points with love ❤️The author critiques the recent surge in pronatalist discourse and policies from right-wing politicians, tech billionaires, and commentators (e.g., JD Vance, Elon Musk, Nigel Farage), who advocate for increased birth rates. The author argues that these proponents fail to acknowledge the immense practical challenges and lack of support faced by parents, particularly those without extensive staff or resources, and proposes a 'parenting entrance test' for them.
Trending- 1 Recent: Spread of population-boosting discourse and policies across Europe and US
- 2 June 8, 2025: Article published
- Potential for policies incentivizing birth rates without adequate support for parents
- Increased pressure on individuals to have children
- Perpetuation of unrealistic expectations about parenting
What: A critical commentary on the pronatalist movement, where right-wing politicians and figures advocate for increased birth rates, contrasting their rhetoric with the realities and difficulties of raising children without significant support.
When: Published June 8, 2025. Discusses recent spread of population-boosting discourse.
Where: Europe (Hungary, Poland, Greece, Italy), United States.
Why: Right-wing figures believe more babies are needed to address perceived societal issues or risks to civilization (e.g., declining birthrates, global warming). The author's 'why' is to challenge this rhetoric by highlighting the unacknowledged burdens on parents.
How: Through political speeches, policy proposals (e.g., $5,000 'baby bonus'), and public commentary. The author responds with satirical 'entrance test' scenarios depicting the challenges of parenting.